free celebrity nude Live cam, pictures and videos!

The Xray Super-FAQ: Theory, Facts, and Examples

Forum rules
18+

The Xray Super-FAQ: Theory, Facts, and Examples

Unread postby bluefalcon » Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:32 pm

Thanks for taking the time to read this. This will initially be a three part FAQ in three posts. I will likely add to it later. The goal of this FAQ is to help identify a good candidate image for xraying, a poor candidate image for xraying, and to also help those who would like to xray images on their own. This is not a complete guide on how to xray, rather it is to clear up common misconceptions about xraying. What it can and can't do. A little warning: these image files are rather large at about 1mb each.
  • 8

Attachments
xrfaq1.jpg
Part 1
xrayfaq2.jpg
Part 2
hid.jpg
Part 3
User avatar
bluefalcon
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:49 am
Reputation: 182

Re: The Xray Super-FAQ: Theory, Facts, and Examples

Unread postby bluefalcon » Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:56 am

A bit more information about lighting, white, and black levels. And overall image quality.
  • 1

Attachments
noise.jpg
blown highlights.jpg
t1.jpg
User avatar
bluefalcon
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:49 am
Reputation: 182

Re: The Xray Super-FAQ: Theory, Facts, and Examples

Unread postby bluefalcon » Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:30 am

If there is one thing about xraying that keeps it from becoming more popular and embraced by our pervy community, I would have to say it's the Burn brush. "Burning" is when pixels are decreased in light levels (like, for example, from 255 to 235). It's function is not much different than curves or the B/C boost. Virtually all xrays decrease or increase levels for better contrast. So, why is it a bad thing? Well, when the "burn brush" is used like a paintbrush it ceases to be a tool to discover hidden goodies, instead it becomes a tool to create the goodies themselves. Perhaps the most abused tool in "xraying", it has become an instantly recognizable sign of a faked xray. The first single image of boobalicious Katy Perry was done by me, using the burn brush. Notice how clear and crisp the edges are, notice how the nipples are gray and without dimension? I didn't xray anything. I didn't attempt a curves adjustment, I didn't B/C boost, I didn't adjust hue/saturation, I just clicked on the image 6 times with two different sizes of the burn brush. This is an extreme example, most xrayers don't do this, right? Well....

Our second image below has 5 different xrays done by 5 different people (including me). As Dilbert rightly pointed out "its funny to see nipples in different places in all these x-rays..." There is obviously some heavy burning going on here. A simple curves, or B/C boost, did not make the nipples pop out. So, people kind of stared at the image awhile until they found what they were looking for. Call it a "nipple mirage" but after hunching in front of the monitor for 5 minutes your eyes start seeing what you want them to see. A dark blotch suddenly looks like a nipple, and since the curves/boost didn't work, people reached for the burn brush so others can see what they're seeing. I doubt any of the xrayers set out to purposely fake an xray, yet only one of these xrays can be "real". Personally, none of these are true xrays, imo. Some are closer than others, but none managed to truly isolate the information.

I want requestors to be aware of this "technique", as well-intentioned as it may be, it's basically guesswork.
I would like xrayers to be aware that using the burn brush to guesstimate crosses the line from xray to fake.

This technique is still debated as being a valid way to xray, and while burning can be used appropriately, it's been my experience that it rarely ever is.
  • 0

Attachments
eyes.jpg
eyes.jpg (113.12 KiB) Viewed 2881 times
burning.jpg
User avatar
bluefalcon
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:49 am
Reputation: 182

Re: The Xray Super-FAQ: Theory, Facts, and Examples

Unread postby bluefalcon » Sun Jan 06, 2013 7:11 am

About reflective/shiny clothes, and a bit more about theory.

P.S. Some people on the internet believe that all xraying is fake. They do not believe that light can permeate clothes in such a manner. Here's a simple way to prove that you can see through clothing: hold up your t-shirt in front of your face and look at your computer screen. If you're wearing a white t-shirt you could almost read the words. Now, try it with a thick, dark sweater. Any non-believers can also read this FAQ and try the images above using the exact same settings I show in the FAQ, and get the exact same results. If anyone tells you all xraying is 'fake' send them here and let them try it for themselves. What's hurting the reputation of xraying is the massive amount of fake xrays that are done without people being told they are indeed fake.
  • 0

Attachments
ftf.jpg
User avatar
bluefalcon
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:49 am
Reputation: 182

Re: The Xray Super-FAQ: Theory, Facts, and Examples

Unread postby bluefalcon » Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:46 am

A quickie about Shadows/Highlights
  • 0

Attachments
sha.jpg
User avatar
bluefalcon
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:49 am
Reputation: 182

Re: The Xray Super-FAQ: Theory, Facts, and Examples

Unread postby rico » Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:34 pm

  • 0

rico
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 7:05 pm
Reputation: -2
Do you fake?: Yes
Country: france

Re: The Xray Super-FAQ: Theory, Facts, and Examples

Unread postby PEDO HUNTER » Sun Jan 08, 2017 8:32 pm

RICO IS TRYING TO GET YOU TO FAKE UNDER AGED GIRLS THE PEDOPHILE.
  • 0

Attachments
_warning__pedo_on_watch_by_segnosis.png
_warning__pedo_on_watch_by_segnosis.png (17.87 KiB) Viewed 46 times
PEDO HUNTER HUNTING PEDOS ON FAKE THE BITCH


Image
User avatar
PEDO HUNTER
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2016 2:37 pm
Reputation: -13

Re: The Xray Super-FAQ: Theory, Facts, and Examples

Unread postby rico » Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:25 pm

possible cum her http://viid.me/qie2Ym
  • 0

rico
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 7:05 pm
Reputation: -2
Do you fake?: Yes
Country: france

Re: The Xray Super-FAQ: Theory, Facts, and Examples

Unread postby JUDGE JUDY » Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:34 pm

JUDGE JUDY THINKS
  • 0

Attachments
33.png
33.png (193.47 KiB) Viewed 40 times
JUDGE JUDY'S JUDGEMENT ARE FINAL AND CAN NOT BE DISPUTED
User avatar
JUDGE JUDY
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:37 am
Reputation: 49


Return to Request Amateur Xrays

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

This is an 18+ site. All content is from 3rd party or user-contributed